

So why does the internet and gaming :journalists" tell us the opposite? Is MS STILL paying loads of money to right a ship that's being raplaced in a couple months? Or does brand loyalty just run THAT deep in "journalists" that in most cases are supposed to be unbiased? Brands specific sites are one thing, I wouldn't expect OPM to review Halo.
Gta 7 xbox 360 ps3#
As much as I'd like to see backwards flying dragons and have my armor class randomly go down to 0 so I get one-shotted by a crab.I can't say it ever happens to me, not even when the PS3 version was at it's worst. Almost every day, to this day, I hear co-workers and friends talk about all the glitches they ran into the previous night playing Skyrim 360.

All the internet and media say is how much better both are on 360, meanwhile I have owned both versions of both games, and both border on being what I would call "broken" on 360, so many bugs and glitches it's rediculous, of which I would say I see NONE of on PS3. GTA4 and Skyrim are perfect examples.and not coincidentally the 2 biggest games hype-wise this gen. I thought people in general were sick of being lied to by authority and the media. apparently, they are, because people have, and will continue to go around repeating this crap as though it's true. I mean why are these guys still out-right lying and telling us to not believe our eyes and our own experiences? Are people so easily brainwashed by anyone who calls themselves an "authority"?. I've been sick of the blatant fanboyism in the gaming (pseudo-)"journalism& quot industry since like 2007, but at this point, it's starting to get real silly.but no less infuriating.
